Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Daniel Rodrigues vs Aidan Kim Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Rodrigues vs Kim analysis and find out who is favored!
Daniel Rodrigues vs Aidan Kim Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Rodrigues 1 - 0 Kim
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Rodrigues has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Kim has won 45.28%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Rodrigues, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Kim has won 53.33%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 34.88% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Rodrigues has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Kim has saved 61.11% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Rodrigues has won 14.29% of matches played (W/L 1/ 6), with Kim winning 50% (W/L 4/ 4) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Rodrigues has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 59% (W/L 20/ 14), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 44% (W/L 4/ 5). Kim has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 52% (W/L 11/ 10), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1).
- Player level: In the last year, Rodrigues has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 20% of matches (W/L 1/ 4), where as Kim has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 50% of matches (W/L 4/ 4). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 1 times before with Rodrigues winning 1 times and Kim being victorious 0 times. They have played 3 sets in total, with Rodrigues winning 2 and Kim winning 1. The last match between Rodrigues and Kim was at the M15 Orange Park, 05-05-2023, Quarterfinals, Clay with Daniel Rodrigues getting the victory 6-4 3-6 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:29:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Rodrigues and Kim have played a deciding set 1 times, with Rodrigues winning 1 times and Kim 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Rodrigues winning 0, and Kim 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Rodrigues has played against opponents with an average rank of 211.57 while Kim has played against players with an average rank of 153.13.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Rodrigues has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Kim has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Rodrigues has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Kim has converted 33.33% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
883
Rank
600
High
24
Age
R
Plays
1
Total0
0
Hard0
1
Clay0
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
877
Rank
700
High
19
Age
Plays
L
L
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
Form
L
L
W
L
W
W
L
L
W
L
55% (96-78)
Career Total W/L
47% (26-29)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
50% (1-1)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
| stats | Daniel Rodrigues | Aidan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 0 |
| Sets Won | 2 | 1 |
| Games Won | 15 | 13 |
| Aces (Total) | 1 | 2 |
| DFs (Total) | 1 | 4 |
| Avg Match Time | 2:29:0 | 2:29:0 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (62/94) | 58% (49/85) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 61% (38/62) | 61% (30/49) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 47% (15/32) | 42% (15/36) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 86% (6/7) | 42% (5/12) |
| Return Points W% | 47% (40/85) | 44% (41/94) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (1/0) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-4 3-6 6-3 |
Stats 
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Aidan Kim
66%
(
62 of
94)
1st Serve %
58%
(
49 of
85)
1
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
4
61%
(
38 of
62)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
47%
(
15 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
15 of
36)
86%
(
6 of
7)
Break Points Won
42%
(
5 of
12)
44%
(
41 of
94)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
86
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Daniel Rodrigues | Aidan Kim |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 60% (3/2) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 49% (21/22) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0.62 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 13 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0.52 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 11 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1:51:30 |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 65% (97/150) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 63% (61/97) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 45% (24/53) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 33% (7/21) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 42% (62/146) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/1) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/1) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 50% (2/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Daniel Rodrigues Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Q1 |
Stats
Adria Soriano Barrera
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
55%
(
41 of
75)
12
Aces
5
5
Double Faults
9
81%
(
29 of
36)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
27 of
41)
50%
(
11 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
14 of
34)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
31%
(
18 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
34 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
63%
(
30 of
48)
1st Serve %
55%
(
28 of
51)
5
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
73%
(
22 of
30)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
9 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
9 of
23)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
17 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
55%
(
28 of
51)
59
Total Points Won
40
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Jake Van Emburgh
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
56%
(
68 of
122)
1st Serve %
62%
(
53 of
86)
10
Aces
6
7
Double Faults
7
76%
(
52 of
68)
1st Serve Won
85%
(
45 of
53)
46%
(
25 of
54)
2nd Serve Won
64%
(
21 of
33)
100%
(
2 of
2)
Break Points Won
29%
(
4 of
14)
37%
(
45 of
122)
Rtn Points Won
23%
(
20 of
86)
97
Total Points Won
111
|
7-6(3) 2-6 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Illia Stoliar
63%
(
29 of
46)
1st Serve %
72%
(
38 of
53)
3
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
3
79%
(
23 of
29)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
25 of
38)
82%
(
14 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
5 of
15)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
20%
(
9 of
46)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
23 of
53)
60
Total Points Won
39
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Felix Gill
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
59%
(
41 of
70)
1st Serve %
58%
(
35 of
60)
6
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
4
78%
(
32 of
41)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
23 of
35)
45%
(
13 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
36%
(
25 of
70)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
27 of
60)
72
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Braden Shick
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
57%
(
27 of
47)
1st Serve %
44%
(
24 of
54)
4
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
6
74%
(
20 of
27)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
15 of
24)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
38%
(
18 of
47)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
27 of
54)
56
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 2-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Michael Zheng
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
47%
(
30 of
64)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
77%
(
23 of
30)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
17 of
30)
47%
(
16 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
11%
(
1 of
9)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
27 of
51)
66
Total Points Won
49
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Daniel Rodrigues
Player
Gabi Adrian Boitan
71%
(
44 of
62)
1st Serve %
72%
(
44 of
61)
2
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
61%
(
27 of
44)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
28 of
44)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
6%
(
1 of
17)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
3 of
6)
40%
(
25 of
62)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
32 of
61)
69
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stefan Popovic
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
66%
(
33 of
50)
1st Serve %
67%
(
29 of
43)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
3
70%
(
23 of
33)
1st Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
59%
(
10 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
6 of
14)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
34%
(
17 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
57
Total Points Won
36
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Manuel Guinard
Player
Daniel Rodrigues
66%
(
63 of
96)
1st Serve %
63%
(
45 of
71)
4
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
6
62%
(
39 of
63)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
24 of
45)
42%
(
14 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
27%
(
4 of
15)
45%
(
43 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
36 of
71)
89
Total Points Won
78
|
7-6(1) 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Aidan Kim Recent Matches Played
Before:
| opponent | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R2 |
Stats
Axel Nefve
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
49 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
54 of
81)
6
Aces
8
4
Double Faults
6
76%
(
37 of
49)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
32 of
54)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
35%
(
28 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
81)
88
Total Points Won
73
|
4-6 6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Marlon Vankan
62%
(
43 of
69)
1st Serve %
56%
(
37 of
66)
5
Aces
0
5
Double Faults
6
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve Won
51%
(
19 of
37)
42%
(
11 of
26)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
36%
(
5 of
14)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
42%
(
29 of
69)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
34 of
66)
74
Total Points Won
61
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Mchugh
Player
Aidan Kim
61%
(
51 of
83)
1st Serve %
64%
(
55 of
86)
2
Aces
9
3
Double Faults
3
65%
(
33 of
51)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
33 of
55)
59%
(
19 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
13 of
31)
60%
(
6 of
10)
Break Points Won
60%
(
3 of
5)
37%
(
31 of
83)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
40 of
86)
92
Total Points Won
77
|
6-3 5-7 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Blaise Bicknell
Player
Aidan Kim
63%
(
41 of
65)
1st Serve %
57%
(
27 of
47)
0
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
3
80%
(
33 of
41)
1st Serve Won
74%
(
20 of
27)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
4 of
20)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
34%
(
22 of
65)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
23 of
47)
66
Total Points Won
46
|
6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Semen Pankin
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
44%
(
27 of
61)
4
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
4
77%
(
37 of
48)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
18 of
27)
50%
(
12 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
50%
(
3 of
6)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
32%
(
23 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
26 of
61)
75
Total Points Won
58
|
7-5 6-3 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Preston Brown
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
32%
(
17 of
53)
1
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
9
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
9 of
17)
56%
(
9 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
25%
(
11 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
26 of
53)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Ethan Quinn
Player
Aidan Kim
53%
(
27 of
51)
1st Serve %
60%
(
36 of
60)
5
Aces
4
5
Double Faults
2
70%
(
19 of
27)
1st Serve Won
53%
(
19 of
36)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
11 of
24)
71%
(
5 of
7)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
37%
(
19 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
30 of
60)
62
Total Points Won
49
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Aidan Kim
Player
Daniel Little
70%
(
35 of
50)
1st Serve %
50%
(
28 of
56)
9
Aces
3
4
Double Faults
3
83%
(
29 of
35)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
16 of
28)
40%
(
6 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
15 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
26 of
56)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Evan Zhu
Player
Aidan Kim
69%
(
55 of
80)
1st Serve %
67%
(
67 of
100)
7
Aces
6
4
Double Faults
4
71%
(
39 of
55)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
37 of
67)
60%
(
15 of
25)
2nd Serve Won
55%
(
18 of
33)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
33%
(
26 of
80)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
45 of
100)
99
Total Points Won
81
|
6-2 6-7(5) 4-1 ret. | H2H | ||
| F |
Stats
Dmitry Popko
Player
Aidan Kim
41%
(
24 of
59)
1st Serve %
59%
(
30 of
51)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
3
58%
(
14 of
24)
1st Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
63%
(
22 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
26 of
51)
62
Total Points Won
48
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
view more
Rodrigues Vs Kim Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Rodrigues are available here and Kim photos here.
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Aidan Kim
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
